It a poetic riff (on moral philosophy) that acknowledges 'Morality' does not exist, and/but to be moral empathy is required, so the questions arises, what is the ethical response to morality? (or to claims that it exists or is required (like god or karma) for a moral life.)
This current piece (a current but bad place to start) is in response to claims ( by a non substacker) I am a relativist from a structuralist (Steven Pinker / Sam Harris-ish style) who talks about the real world of reality (apparently I am infected by deconstructionist or pomo tropes). As a neo-pyrrhonist this (supposed) relativism is a step towards wisdom/ataraxia, but I am working from evolutionary complexities amidst the taphonomical evidences that survive into our day.
I use the frame of 'worlding' to include all human activities which we think of as different things, but are really just outcomes of the urge to should ourselves among others. These outcomes include the complex (art/rites/rituals/performance/religions/mores/morality/karma/god/fideism).
I am not a relatavists because there is good and bad worlding.
I have no idea what you're trying to say.
Thank you for your efforts.
It a poetic riff (on moral philosophy) that acknowledges 'Morality' does not exist, and/but to be moral empathy is required, so the questions arises, what is the ethical response to morality? (or to claims that it exists or is required (like god or karma) for a moral life.)
This current piece (a current but bad place to start) is in response to claims ( by a non substacker) I am a relativist from a structuralist (Steven Pinker / Sam Harris-ish style) who talks about the real world of reality (apparently I am infected by deconstructionist or pomo tropes). As a neo-pyrrhonist this (supposed) relativism is a step towards wisdom/ataraxia, but I am working from evolutionary complexities amidst the taphonomical evidences that survive into our day.
I use the frame of 'worlding' to include all human activities which we think of as different things, but are really just outcomes of the urge to should ourselves among others. These outcomes include the complex (art/rites/rituals/performance/religions/mores/morality/karma/god/fideism).
I am not a relatavists because there is good and bad worlding.
The framework is first explored here
https://www.academia.edu/40978261/Why_we_should_an_introduction_by_memoir_into_the_implications_of_the_Egalitarian_Revolution_of_the_Paleolithic_or_Anyone_for_cake
My blog is a type of thinking aloud so thanks again for you visit.