How others are using the word and the thing that is the world, also digital suffering?
whyweshould.substack.com
How others are using the word and the thing that is the world, also digital suffering?
not just me wondering and agenting into the world/worlding/worldbuilding
1 Why general artificial intelligence will not be realized
The main thesis of this paper is that we will not be able to realize AGI because computers are not in the world.
Well worth reading for its introduction alone. Now have to research Hubert Dreyfus.
2a Introduction to Towards Causal Foundations of Safe AGI
Has a great chart (hasn’t yet slashed blame/credit):
(see also 2b Causality: A Brief Introduction)
via Martin Ciupa.
On a side note some are wondering about digital suffering like in:
But if computers are not in the world, then there is no suffering.
Also, is it ethical to put anything in the world if it leads to suffering?
New version of part of this post at whyweshould.loofs-samorzewski.com .
see also, (but the extended mind metaphor is perhaps too much mind (the usual grandiose conceitedness overreaching in outreach) whereas todays' routines do not pray enough world in their agency/responsibilities) {also notice here how the preposition capture movement, which we are disposed to assume/forget/take-for-granted when we seek meaning and other forms of safety}{languages which use more declensions and less positions do they take movement more or less for granted??}
https://www.themarginalian.org/2022/03/22/the-extended-mind/